When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Teamwork is of the great importance to the academic projects because sometimes teachers assign projects that require collaboration of a group of students. Many students believe that working and learning is best done in a group setting, while many others prefer to work alone. I concur with the former group of students because of two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First of all, students can exchange their ideas with their teammates when they are working collaboratively. Not all students have the same point of views toward the solving the problem; therefore, they can take advantage of this diversity of attitudes for tackling problems. Indeed, solving an academic issue in an assignment or class project entails hours of thinking and testing different methods; thus, cooperating and consulting with other students can ease the process of solving. When several students propose different solutions, the problem is liable to be solved by at least one of those solutions, although some of solutions might not work. For instance, I was assigned to carry out an academic project in the Mechatronics laboratory when I was at sophomore year of my undergraduate studies. I was supposed to accomplish that project in a group so that I could ask for help and advice from other students to overcome the challenges of the project in a short time. Had I not asked for help from other students, I would have not ended the project in such short time.
Furthermore, students can correct each other's mistakes when they work together. To be more specific, all students are prone to make mistakes, but not all students make the same mistakes. Therefore, students can mention their teammate's mistake and prevent future faults. On the other hand, when a student is working alone, he is liable to repeat his mistake several times because there is no one to warn him and correct him.
It is fair to conclude that working in a group can help students to learn more effectively than working by themselves. This is because they can both exchange their opinions and correct each other's mistakes during a teamwork.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 70
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site Use specific reasons and examples to 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the solutions') or simply say ''some solutions''.
Suggestion: some of the solutions; some solutions
... least one of those solutions, although some of solutions might not work. For instance, I was ass...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02535211268 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72131629702 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515492957746 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1540693768 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406596584447 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138355113729 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732362054393 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248999567833 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188986463447 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.