Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. What are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on the society?
The world needs scientists, nearly as much as it is in need of philosophers; yet, an imbalance may occur when society demands for practical scientists at the field, but the individuals prefer abstraction and ideas. Therefore, it seems that a lack of interest in empirical subjects drives people to Humanities and Arts instead of sciences. Another cause may be due to the views that people hold of these subjects. Such imbalance may have a positive impact on society as it could prevent the pitfalls of excessive development.
In regard to the lack of interest; one could argue that the empirical approach is rigid and lacks the flexibility that could entice the human creativity. This inflexibility might repel people since they may prefer to work in less structured fields ‘as’ it is an innate trait of human beings to opt for freedom over rules and order. As for the effects of perspective; the majority seems to hold this view that science majors are more difficult in comparison and therefore it would be of less trouble to go for easier subjects. For example, many of the medical students I have met seem to think they would have been better off if they had gone to law school instead. This view may not be necessarily true since talents could be of factor in determining whether a subject is difficult.
To evaluate the impacts, one could consider the examples of World War I and World War II. ‘To elaborate’, Industrial Revolution that led to these tragic wars was the result of rapid development in science. Such abrupt progress in these fields paired with primordial and less developed philosophies and values had a heavy and grim consequence for humankind. So, to attract more brilliant minds to subjects other than sciences may be of great use in repairing filling the gap currently present between theories and practices.
Overall, it seems that the value this generation holds for freedom, imagination and creativity has urged them to pursue their own callings rather than the demands of society, but this might be just what our world requires in order to overcome its shortcomings and move towards a more peaceful and less destructive state.
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree courses The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- The graph gives information about the percentage of the population if four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 78
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, as for, for example, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97527472527 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74539909992 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.7657416716 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.357142857 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147478529174 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438853530992 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379628044396 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826903828407 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339092088305 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.