In the past, most people used to travel to their place of work. With increased use of computers, the internet and smartphones, more and more people are starting to work from home.What are the advantages and disadvantages of
As modern technological devices enable people to perform their tasks actively without traveling to work, many people choose to work from home. Although its benefits in the environment and work comfort are conspicuous, poor communication between staff and managers should also be considered.
On the one hand, there must be some valid rationales why this trend can achieve such huge prominence. The most transparent benefit lies in its implication on national environment well-being since fewer gas fumes are created. By that I mean, as people decide to work individually at home through internet-connection devices, their demand for private transport use declines predictably. Unless this infiltration of technology in the way people work has not been adopted, the amount of carbon dioxide could have been increased, leading to several urgent global environmental problems involving air pollution and climate change. In terms of individuals, meanwhile, the provision of an appropriate environment enables them to perform tasks actively and comfortably. A case in point can be seen in the common situation of nuclear families, who have to either accomplish work requirements or nurture their children. Since they are able to work on their flow without being restricted by companies, these activities might be ensured to be handled simultaneously.
Notwithstanding the above convenient features, working at home can decrease work productivity by limiting communication between colleagues and bosses. As effective communication may naturally be instilled when workers of the same companies are arranged into a group, ignoring this key element can put certain companies applying teleworking into trouble. This is because delivered information can easily be misled since managers might not be able to transmit their ideas comprehensively through modern communication devices. In addition to this, the abundant sources of entertainment from technological devices can also distract employees’ focus on work, which reduces their motivation and productivity.
In conclusion, technology is a promising tool that changes the current picture of work in an eco-friendly way. However, teleworking should be considered cautiously by businesses in order to ensure employees working effectiveness.
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 41
- The chart below shows the movement of people from rural to urban areas in three countries and predictions for future years 62
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 87
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred 11
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, may, so, still, well, while, i mean, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82142857143 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32584192195 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633928571429 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7409460627 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.4 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207244130275 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753954688746 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815282752068 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139972581532 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652607480822 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.