People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
We as humans are presented with varied number of choices at every step in our day to day lives. To pick from either of these choices, we need to take a decision. This decision can be as trivial as whether to take the metro or drive to work, or as pivotal as taking a call to perform euthanasia on your loved one. Mainly these decisions we take are driven by two primary factors - logic and emotion. The prompt given states that those who take a rash decision driven by emotions and then try to reason their way out with logic, are poor decision makers. I mostly agree with the prompt for the below reasons.
Firstly, there are many encounters that we have in life where our decisions are irreversible. Once we have made that final call, there is no turning back. While taking such pivotal judgements, it is important to be dispassionate and think with logic first. We have to consider all possible scenarios which may lead to regret later. For example, in an event of war, the governments of nations have to take a decision whether to charge on their enemy or not. Or the life or death calls that surgeons have to take on the operation table. Such decisions need to be dealt with sheer logic and we cannot surrender to our emotions, as it would lead to an irrevocable catastrophe.
Moreover, making hasty decision and then trying to justify it with shoddy logic is a nature of an escapist. In order to weave out of the consequences of a poor decision, this person will try to concoct a story to try to sound as logical as possible. This going forward becomes a pattern and has adverse effects on a person's personality and character. This builds in an inherent nonchalance, where the individual does not think about the repercussions of his/her own activities. Successful people are born out of commitment to their work and persistence where their pivotal life changing decisions are made using logic and not driven by the whims and fancies of their emotions.
I concede that there might be instances where emotion trumps logic. But it is our responsibility that we remain calm and composed in order to make an objective decision which is critical to us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 66
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather and lo 68
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
- The primary goal of education is to get a job 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le. This going forward becomes a pattern and has adverse effects on a persons per...
^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...a pattern and has adverse effects on a persons personality and character. This builds ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65968586387 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59974874989 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5012328559 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293277597669 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884684004713 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699294825855 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185306903701 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342522543074 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.