In some countries, more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this question?
In some areas, an increasing number of people are keen on discovering the history of the place where they stay. In this essay, I will examine the factors that contribute towards this given situation and analyse how this issue can be taken by people.
There are several factors that influence people exploring the history of their accommodations. Firstly, getting some insights from the place we live in, in some specific purpose, are very crucial for those who still fully implement such customs. For instance, in Indonesia specifically in the region of Manado people are hardly willing to live in a place that they do not have an information about its background before, even though, the place is inexpensive. Secondly, some houses might be pretty scary; therefore, the owners tend to sell them with a lower price. If it is not being, it should be one of the most common reasons in the cases why so many people are questioning about the story behind some houses before they afford them.
A few ways can be taken to help people dealing with their curiosity in terms of understanding the story behind the place they live in. As we are living in the computer age, utilizing the internet and absorbing as much as possible information from it could be the easiest way to overcome this phenomenon. On the other way, take into consederation to consult with individuals, such as historians or neighbours, before purchasing accommodations will also helpful for those who want to have some thoughts.
In conclusion, curiosity to have some insights behind houses we live in is mainly caused by some customs and horror stories. This essay suggested that the solutions to this problem are twofold: to utilize the internet to get wide range understanding of these houses and to encourage people to have some discussion with professionals or people living around their houses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | tronghuy230903 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- people today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out What are the causes What are the solution 61
- International tourism has brought about enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages 84
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in thepopularity of fashion clothes and consume goods Do you agree or disagree 11
- A lot of people have become dependent on technology as it plays a big role in our daily lives Do you agree that living in computer age has more advantages than disadvantages Describe the positive and negative impacts of technology on our lives and give yo 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be one of the most common reasons in the cases why so many people are questioning...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96805111821 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7347981546 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555910543131 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4268281059 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.583333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339793172449 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124215396398 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566042968646 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217283478886 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510548280643 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.