Providing financial aid to the poor can increase poverty. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
At the present time, the low-income families are supported by funding aids which tendentiously perpetuate poverty. Personally, I cite the same perspective with this issue for noteworthy points which will be deliberated more below.
On the one hand, despite raising poverty level, the economic support will highly help the have-nots society to achieve modern medical facilities. This effectively increases public health rate that the majority of poor folks significantly contribute to. In addition, they can allocate their money to learn some of hard and soft skills by skill training which is designed to provide the essential knowledge and abilities. Accordingly, those inhabitants may either fulfill the specific job requirements or create physical capital and income-generating activities resulting in better economic life.
On the other hand, in my viewpoint, this issue may indicate drawbacks that impoverished people will become wholly reliant on the assistance. Barely do they apply for job to lift up a life-sustained character, ever worse normalise the status of being needy. Consequently, a country will face severe issue of unemployement rate rather than better quality of its welfare and prosperity. Furthermore, some people probably spend financial assistance to purchase tertiary and supplementary stuff to look trendy without considering its function. Apparently, they desire to mimic wealthy person in way of desperate attempt to be rich aiming for public recognition.
In conclusion, it seems to me that monetary aids given to deprived persons rise the poverty levels considering that financial aids is lead to the over-dependency and the luxury lifestyle. This is provided that such assistance should be prior to gain neccessary skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Some people think technology development decreases crime while others believe it actually encourages crime Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some argue that music mainly serves as a way for individuals to reduce their stress and anxiety To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Today the expensive price of popular consumer products is because of the power of advertising and not real needs of people Do you agree or disagree 84
- These days people often move around They often live in several different places in their lifetime What are the advantages and disadvantages of both 80
- There is more and more outrage and anger common in society today Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lies are supported by funding aids which tendentiously perpetuate poverty. Person...
^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly help the have-nots society to achieve modern medical facilities. This effectiv...
^^
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ties. Accordingly, those inhabitants may either fulfill the specific job requirem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, but, consequently, furthermore, if, look, may, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65909090909 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13284827146 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693181818182 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3912598207 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125957498807 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373391022994 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402613412165 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737508888965 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491966070948 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lies are supported by funding aids which tendentiously perpetuate poverty. Person...
^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly help the have-nots society to achieve modern medical facilities. This effectiv...
^^
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ties. Accordingly, those inhabitants may either fulfill the specific job requirem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, but, consequently, furthermore, if, look, may, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65909090909 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13284827146 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693181818182 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3912598207 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125957498807 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373391022994 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402613412165 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737508888965 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491966070948 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.