More and more people want to buy clothes, car and other products from well-known brands. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, more and more the rich people they use a lot of famous brands. That thing prove their social status and wealth. But use well-known brand really waste money and instead of they spend money for buy clothes or car, they can take care of themselves. So I will dicuss two both view in this essay.
On the one hand, famous brands which help them have wealth or luxurious. And the rich people they want to buy them to increase their value or enhance people’s appearance. A standout example for this cars from luxurious brand such as Porsche and Mercedes. These are often exorbitant due to their materials and unique features. Because those from brand names can be more expensive, but they are credible and give people a sense of satisfaction when using them. In addition, the rich people they like appear in front of everyone so they can’t wear clothes cheaper and from small brand. And when they wear famous clothes it also help producer advertisement their brand.
On the other hand, using luxurious brands really waste more money and waste time when they go shopping. Beside that, also make the poor people they jealious when they any nothing. For example, the poor people they see someone else richer than them. They want to that things belong to their ownership. And that thing make social disparity. Therefor, instead they buy clothes or cars, they can take care of themselves to ehancing their value.
In conclusion, using famous brand it good for themselves but they have to balance .
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2
- Big salary is more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people think that young people should spend more of their free time at home with their families and spend less time entertaining themselves outside others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 90
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...d when they wear famous clothes it also help producer advertisement their brand. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of themselves to ehancing their value. In conclusion, using famous brand it goo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... for themselves but they have to balance .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, really, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85271317829 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2681746428 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531007751938 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0302416052 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.5555555556 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196061191348 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684358417363 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568112629175 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128647493158 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653025522795 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.