Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Government is responsible for conducting the administration of a nation, representing a nation and working for the betterment of people and nation. It is the duty of the government to deal with the problems of the nation and its citizen, either that is of today or of tomorrow. The real test of the government, though lies in the hard times and unexpected times, the efficiency and effectiveness of the government are examined through the solution of present problems. Hence, I agree that the immediate problems should generally be prioritized but in some instances the anticipated problems of future should also be given equal or precedence importance.
The citizens are disturbed by the immediate problems; they require attention at present. For e.g. the aid to the calamities, the sudden elevation in price of basic foods, sudden disease outbreak, etc. which cannot be handled past present time should be dealt immediately. The rainy season is ongoing in Nepal and landslide and floods causing grave loss of lives and resources is common, Nepal is also an earthquake-prone nation. If the government decides to pass budget on building earthquake resistant building rather than for providing aid and relieve to the flood and landslide-affected people at present, the government will be castigated by all the people. Similarly, people in developing nations, where a majority of population lies below poverty might be heavily affected if such problems are kept too long.
The immediate problems, if not attended timely, can pose a great threat in the future. Let us consider a historical event of Nepal, the People’s Movement II. The scanty demands of the people for the democracy and their rights and freedom where ignored by the-then government of Nepal and ultimately Nepal faced 12-years long civil war killing over 15000 people which engulfed 250-year long monarchy of Nepal. Likewise, the shortage of safe drinking water, when ignored can cause the widespread transmission of water-borne diseases. Also, the immediate issue like shortage of job, when ignored in its initial stage can later manifest as a greater economic problem and lead to the situation such as increase in crime rate, disturbance of peace, and economic crisis of a nation.
Nonetheless, the immediate problems of today are the anticipated problems of the yesterday. Any event that is occurring at present is the result of certain events of yesterday hence if the anticipated problem’s cause at present is identified and dealt with, the problem can be minor otherwise, the anticipated problem can unfold as a grave threat. For instance, in the above mentioned example, the landslide and the flood does not occur at once, it takes time to build up the water and there are reasons like blockage of rivers, illicit constructions in the river corridors, deforestation, etc. that lead to the such grievous situation. If these anticipations were scrutinized and dealt in the past, then the reality of today could be different. Similarly, in the deadly earthquake of 2015 of Nepal, many old, non-renovated buildings and illegally constructed weak buildings were regarded as the cause of such a great loss, so such losses could have been prevented if government had taken proper measures to solve the anticipated problem of an earthquake-prone nation.
Wrapping up, the immediate problem is a major concern, however sometimes, when the anticipated problem unfolds in reality it is a great disaster so government should solve the immediate problems, but if the anticipated problems pose greater risk in the future, it should be dealt when the problem is in insipid stage.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little 75
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 66
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 815, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted if such problems are kept too long. The immediate problems, if not attended ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., hence, however, if, likewise, nonetheless, similarly, so, then, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3061.0 2235.4752809 137% => OK
No of words: 585.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23247863248 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9180050066 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98739847332 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497435897436 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 960.3 704.065955056 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 17.0 4.99550561798 340% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.3770556464 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.136363636 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5909090909 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327752445008 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091382583998 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117140624757 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207113761943 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121186200179 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 100.480337079 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.