You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
You should write at least 250 words.
It is a common belief that many nations increase sports internationally by setting up professional facilities to train top athletes, instead of creating sports facilities for public using. From my perspective, I believe this trend is a negative development since even trained-top athletes may contributes to the reputation of a country in sporting field, people are more preferrable to maintain a healthy body by doing physical training in public areas.
On the one hand, the government support national sport by building specialised facilities will maximize the capability of the athletes to train in an international level. To be more specific, Asian athletes whose physical appearance and conditions are inevitably smaller than the European ones, therefore they need to train harder with modernized machines to catch up with the volume and duration of international training. As a result, they would have more opportunities to gain championships for their countries. For example, the authorities in Vietnam in 2022 invested a large budget to build a private gym for Vietnamese football team, which helped them train resiliently to play in Asian football match and bring back a trophy proudly. Hence, importing professional facilities for top athletes is a worthwhile investment.
On the other hand, citizens nowadays deserve to utilize sports facilities since the needs to keep fit and maintain a healthy lifestyle is increasing significantly. The violation of prices create a huge barrier to charge for annual membership in gyms. As a consequence, people will choose to do physical activities by using public sports machines in parks to not only maximize financial savings but also enjoy natural environment. Moreover, training in the park is an ideal method for both family members and relationships to encourage a healthy habit by sharing sporty energy as well as cherishing memorable moments together. For instance, a research by WHO in 2023 has shown that urban people's immune system have improve dramatically because of spending their spare times for training in the public parks. Therefore, public sport facilities are vital for people to keep fit and get bonding better.
To sum up, although using budget to buy specialised facilities to train top athletes is an acceptable way, building more sport facilities that everyone can practice is more crucial because it will contribute to a healthier lifestyle and stimulate a chance to be united.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The first chart below shows the percentages of women and men in a country involved in some kinds of home tasks cooking cleaning pet caring and repairing the house The second chart shows the amount of time eac 67
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on society 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative deve 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 67
- The diagram below shows how rain water is collected and then treated to be used as drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 641, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...morable moments together. For instance, a research by WHO in 2023 has shown that urban peo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 715, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
...n that urban peoples immune system have improve dramatically because of spending their ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39480519481 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04813799202 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576623376623 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.3843153199 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.357142857 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274381969634 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971489120751 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082039270155 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191252670681 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703858859591 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 641, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...morable moments together. For instance, a research by WHO in 2023 has shown that urban peo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 715, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
...n that urban peoples immune system have improve dramatically because of spending their ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39480519481 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04813799202 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576623376623 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.3843153199 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.357142857 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274381969634 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971489120751 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082039270155 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191252670681 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703858859591 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.