The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
Leadership is a tricky job, as it demands a lot of versatile traits and a leader is required to adapt depending on situations and different predicaments he may find himself in. And history judges the leaders by the results they achieve; i.e. the amount of success they achieved towards their goals. Nevertheless, a good leader must have confidence in his team, or any group which follows them; and vice versa, i.e. the team must also have confidence in their leader.
Furthermore, communication is key for a team to perform well in any given scenario. Hence, a good leader should not only give clear guidelines to the team, he may also be open to the inputs from the members. As no one appreciates know it all attitude. Especially, if a team is taking diverse tasks, feedback becomes even more importance.
Historically, good leaders have had good decision power and analytical skill, however they always kept their teams with them and welcomed their feedbacks before taking key decisions. Moreover, during modern times, importance of to and fro communication has grown manifold. As current age is information age and everyone has their own opinions. Furthermore, the more collaborative approach a team follows, more positive results are expected as it grows sense of ownership amongst the members. Hence, motivates them to perform better.
Furthermore, during current times, especially if a leader is leading a team comprising of 'Gen-Z' members they must invite and accept feedback from the members as clarity of goals, understanding and ownership of the tasks is amongst key motivators for the said generation. Hence, importance of team input has grown over the period of time.
Therefore, the statement that best leaders encourage feedback from the people whom they lead stands true in my opinion.
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 83
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead 58
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers 66
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...be open to the inputs from the members. As no one appreciates know it all attitude...
^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...specially if a leader is leading a team comprising of Gen-Z members they must invite and acce...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rtance of team input has grown over the period of time. Therefore, the statement that best ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1843003413 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85429541126 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580204778157 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.8358495293 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.266666667 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245410346633 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775514594906 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135836591951 0.0758088955206 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186254239207 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183181760364 0.0667264976115 275% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.