Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could
I undoubtedly disagree with the issue that the scandals are useful, as they focus on the problems that no speaker or reformer ever could. There is a negativity between scandals and problems both are different from one another.
Usually in day to day life, scandals attract more attention of people than any other important information. Scandals won’t focus on the actual problems but it draws attention only. Whenever there is a sex scandal of a polititian, every media focus on this scandal only eventhough there is lot of problems in the society because the intension of the media is to increase its TRP that’s why they don’t focus on the main problem.
Reformer is one who is able to bring the reforms in a perticular fields. In earlier days ploughing the dry land was difficult but now a days it is easy because of the use of the tractors. It was possible because of the reforms performed by the reformer. It is not true that reformer can’t draw more attention than scandels.
Scandals are not good for the society as they bring vey bad impresssion in the society. The person who is involved in any scandals will be trated very bad. Scandals might draw attention but it falis in solving the problems of the society. Because of the scandal some problems remain unnoticed.
To sum it up, Scandals won’t focus on the problems, it just draws the attension and it wont solve the problems of the people. Reformer if he perform better he can definitely draw more attension than the scandal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 23
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself 18
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models. 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...loughing the dry land was difficult but now a days it is easy because of the use of the tr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...hing the dry land was difficult but now a days it is easy because of the use of the tr...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 240, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...in solving the problems of the society. Because of the scandal some problems remain unn...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'performs'.
Suggestion: performs
... problems of the people. Reformer if he perform better he can definitely draw more atte...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 261.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81992337165 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66131051471 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 215.323595506 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513409961686 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4816455767 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8666666667 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.733333333333 5.21951772744 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431543948759 0.243740707755 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145780341139 0.0831039109588 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102986486789 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237491502334 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944842327599 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 100.480337079 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.