Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed
I undoubtely agree that “Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed”, It is the responsibility of teacher as well to dissuade the students who are unlikely to succeed.
When the educational institutions come to know that the student’s are weak in aperticular field, they should be given some time to improve on that subject. Even after providing such timelines, if they are unable to improve the perticular fields, then it is the responsibility of the institution to change the minds of the student’s. Students must be given the other fields in which they are interested.
The reason why the educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students in which they are unlikely to succeed is because when they don’t have interst in a perticular fields and they start working very hard and by the end of the time they willcome to know that they are unable to succeed. By that time they have already wasted lot of time in the subject. Therefore it is better to dissuade the syudent’s in the early stage of their fields so that they can choose an alternating fields. Messi was interested in football and he was not interested in football. He was able to achieve the success because he was encouraged in football in which he was interested.
To sum it up, student’s who are not having the interest’s in a perticular field should be discouraged by the educational institutions and the student’s having the interest’s in a perticular feild must be encouraged by the educational institution.
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models. 33
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 38
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 43
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 33
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 23
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...eady wasted lot of time in the subject. Therefore it is better to dissuade the syudent&ap...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 266.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17293233083 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47524620677 2.79657885939 124% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 215.323595506 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421052631579 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.4756613158 60.3974514979 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.6 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.532632665597 0.243740707755 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219408265405 0.0831039109588 264% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.214528469351 0.0758088955206 283% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382834858593 0.150359130593 255% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.214721231218 0.0667264976115 322% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 100.480337079 40% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.