You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore

Essay topics:

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.

The bar chart shows the average number of years males and females attended school, while the pie chart illustrates the different levels of education that achieved by adults between 2000 and 2010 in Singapore.

Overall, there was an increasing number of years in both males and females in the educating system during the period shown, whilst in Singapore, It can also be seen that Singapore females always settled less time at school in comparison to their male, In addition, the level of education people was performing had increased over the period.

Initially, in 2000, the number of years females attended school in 2008 which remained unchanged until 2008, and then rose to 8,9 years in 2010. In contrast, male citizens spent an average of 8,9 years in school, which boosted frequently to almost 12 or 13 years in 2010.

As can be cleared from the pie charts in 2000, almost one-third of Singapore’s population finished high school. Furthermore, the figures for those also only left school after receiving primary or secondary qualifications were quite high, at 25, 77%, and 26,3 % respectively. However, there was a significant change in 2010 when 30, 31% and 32, 93% of Singapore adults obtained the highest level as university and master degrees. Other qualifications accounted for a lower percentage at about 19%, 15%, and 2%.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-06 tata 73 view
2024-06-06 tata 78 view
2024-06-06 tata 67 view
2023-06-26 TLan168 73 view
2023-06-25 TLan168 78 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts between 2000 and 2010 in Singapore. Overall, there was an increasing number ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orming had increased over the period. Initially, in 2000, the number of years ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly to almost 12 or 13 years in 2010. As can be cleared from the pie charts in...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, second, so, then, third, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14090909091 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7354803091 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627272727273 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5934816187 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.375 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232021808298 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100186709001 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865482317846 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150580424676 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856643359021 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.