Fewer young people do farming work in rural areas. Why? Should young people be encouraged to do farming work?
There has been a significant decline in the number of young people engaging in farming work. This essay will show the reasons behind this trend and why young people should be motivated for working in this field.
Young people becoming unwilling to work in the agriculture industry can be explained as follows. The first reason is that because of the development gap between urban and rural areas, young people tend to stay in big cities after graduation from university to find job opportunities. Big cities are the center of development in the culture and economy of nations, where are a concentration of large companies with various fields while the countrysides are less developed. This leads to a shortage of labor in the countryside, especially in the agriculture industry. Another reason is that jobs that relate to farming are seen as manual work and bring a low wage, so the number of students choosing to study agriculture accounts for a lower percentage than other majorities. This has an adverse impact on the agriculture industry causing a serious dearth of human resources in this field. In Vietnam, for example, according to the statistics, only 2% of students enroll in agriculture every year, although Vietnam is a country that is strongly about agriculture.
Young people should be encouraged and facilitated to do farming work. Firstly, farming jobs require a great deal of manpower to keep up with the currently increasing food demand. A shortage of personnel can reduce productivity in the agricultural industry, and the expansion of the national food supply can be fallen dramatically. As a result, the nation may face a domestic food crisis. Furthermore, farming work can be a vocational pathway for young people. It provides them with practical skills such as using heavy machinery and planting crops, as well as soft skills such as task management, organizational, and communication skills. That way, young people can learn to be more resourceful and responsible in a professional setting.
In conclusion, there are various factors leading to the decline in young people working in agriculture. Therefore, they should be encouraged to work in that sector to respond to its manpower demand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-22 | uyenmia | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-22 | hinhin411 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | phuong_anh_07 | 58 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | thaoduong1902 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this case and what solutions are possible 78
- The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are the effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of people 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- The diagram shows the different stages in the production of woolen goods
- The diagrams show the structure of a solar panel and its use 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20334261838 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99114284935 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537604456825 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9199906006 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42657521899 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151266294928 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181971535867 0.0667982634062 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2874348578 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819753120413 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.