The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates about the unemployment rate during the period of 2012 overall the percentage between rural areas and urban areas shows significant difference in the beggining of the year then the graph shows another rapide movement in the third quarters of the year and ends with similar ratio
Looking at the graph more closely the two graphs are showing opposite moving trends through out the year. the unemployment rate of rural areas were about three timess greater than urban areas approxemately at 6.5percent and 2 percent respectively but then the figure of rural areas were decreasing at 4.5percent while urban areas increased at 4%percent
Furthermore the graph shows another large gap between rural and urban areas in the third quaarters of the year the rual areas tend to rose slightly compared to urbans areas at 5.5percent however urban areas dipped notably at 2percent which is simillar to the starting point afterwards urban areas went up again maintaing similar number to rural areas at the end of the research period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...aphs are showing opposite moving trends through out the year. the unemployment rate of rura...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ite moving trends through out the year. the unemployment rate of rural areas were a...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...e urban areas increased at 4%percent Furthermore the graph shows another large gap betwe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15204678363 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5294814474 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 8.94146341463 22% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 85.0 22.4926829268 378% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.0 43.030603864 258% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 440.5 112.824112599 390% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 85.5 22.9334400587 373% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 27.5 5.23603664747 525% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0701229405845 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077416611669 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530591010609 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658360862609 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450455420999 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 45.6 13.2329268293 345% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -14.8 61.2550243902 -24% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 36.4 10.3012195122 353% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.77 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.82 8.06136585366 147% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.4329268293 249% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 36.0 10.9970731707 327% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 36.0 11.0658536585 325% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.