More and more people want to buy clothes, cars and other products from well-known brands. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Several countries have been improving significantly their structural regulation in such various fields as economic, health care, education … Therefore, it undoubtedly leads to the development of individuals’ lifestyle and wealth; specifically, there is an increasing demand in purchasing goods from widespread brands. From the vantage point, I will dissect the reasons for this trend and whether this tendency is a positive or harmful development.
To commence with, there exists a great number of major/main explanations for the attractiveness of the world-famous products. Firstly, people are willing to show off their wealth by spending money on numerous expensive and stylish products from ubiquitous brands. It also reflects their success in life and work as well as meets the requirements of global lifestyle. Secondly, due to the digital and non-digital marketing in those brands, more citizens around the earth have realized that they are able to afford a multitude of commodities. For instance, if an individual has an intention of possessing a phone, he/she can widely opt for an affordable smartphone from Apple, Samsung or Xiaomi since there are a great number of models and styles.
From a personal view, the trend evidently has both merits and drawbacks to human evolution and the business world. On the one hand, it demonstrates that the quality of human life in some developing countries has been improved much compared to a century ago , where World War resulted in the destruction, death and human activities were largely deteriorated. In addition, purchasing goods from common brands is a normal behaviour because those brands provide users with friendly features and quality assurance. Nevertheless, on the other hand, this critically expands the discrimination between the prosperous and the impoverished/dispossessed. Furthermore, products from small-sized companies or brands of some developing or underdeveloped countries will be depreciated, ignored due to the monopoly of huge recognized brands in the worldwide market, which adversely impacts the economy of these nations.
In conclusion, goods from ubiquitous brands have earned the customers’ belief and trust; however, this still threatens the existence of less recognized brands. Therefore, I utterly believe that people should manage their budgets properly and pertinent measures should be taken to maintain the position of every brand, whether they are widespread or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 50, Rule ID: A_GREAT_NUMBER_OF_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'majors'?
Suggestion: majors
...ce with, there exists a great number of major/main explanations for the attractivenes...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... improved much compared to a century ago , where World War resulted in the destruc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64420485175 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24646164901 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606469002695 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7532647985 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.571428571 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7857142857 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163503393658 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498856745179 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295139822064 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898719620865 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144138475618 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.