Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games.
What are the negative impacts of children playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects?
The acces to computer is limitless. These days a lot of people have permission to laptops widely and vast majority of children play games through these devices. This essay, I will examine the drawbacks on kids playing computers as well as provide solution how to overcome this phenomenon.
Online games affect children growth negatively. When children get addicted to gadgets, they will be less socialize. Kids will not have enough face to face interaction with their surrounding as it is necessary to improve their verbal abilities. If children lack of this ability, they would face so many difficulties in school and would badly affect their academic performance. Secondly, a plethora of information regularly ruin in the internet without being selected can damage children character. Kids who are playing laptops without parenting supervise will possibly obtain underage information and hastily behave towards it. The more time are spent by children through laptops, the more vulnarable they are to grow.
However, there are several actions can be taken considering this appeal. Firstly, is the parents role. By good parenting, parents will be able to prevent children from the detrimental effect of online lives. When parents pay attention to every detail acticivity of the kids, there will be less chance for children to be distracted by laptops. Secondly, is to introduce the children to their surrounding as early as possible. By doing this, it will set a significant sense of social to children’s brains as they aware to their environment and will eventually keep them away from virtual lives.
In conclusion, bad academical performance and characters are two negative results by playing gadgets for children, therefore, good parenting and socialize at the very early lives of them are important to tackle the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-19 | Bông Trang | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-19 | Bông Trang | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | manu_kaur113 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-18 | Revivo Tulaseket | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-05 | Azizberg | 92 | view |
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 95
- Some people fail in school but end up being successful in life Why do you think that is the case What is the most important thing to succeed in life 73
- School should teach students sex education comprehensively do you agree or disagree 73
- The prevention of health problems and health illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 67
- Group eam activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...onsidering this appeal. Firstly, is the parents role. By good parenting, parents will b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay from virtual lives. In conclusion, bad academical performance and character...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35172413793 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80227527736 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589655172414 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3346895566 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2941176471 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257128509161 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824590831928 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498559018536 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158996068525 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627215717333 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.