Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the contemporary era, the development in academic fields paves the way for more people seeking information about scientific research, business and so on. Whilst some of them contend that sharing as much information as possible is beneficial, others firmly believe that some information is too crucial to be shared freely. This essay will delve into both viewpoints and state my perspective.
On one hand, the merits of exchanging information are undeniable. To begin with, this can provide citizens with deeper insights into different realms. For example, should scientific research regarding the extinction of the Dodo be circulated among worldwide citizens, more people will be aware of it and better actions can be taken. As a result, the pressing issue about endangered species can be alleviated. Secondly, this practice can benefit individuals as regards study and work. To be more specific, more sources of official and valid information available align with students finding their projects or coursework less demanding. Hence, their performance at school can be improved, thereby having better job prospects.
On the other hand, data of paramount importance should not be shared freely. First, the incidence of copyright infringement or plagiarism can rise if more information is free. To explain, the advent of technology entitles people to share and save numerous posts, captions and documents. For instance, that a student copies the whole paragraph or essay from a Facebook post without allowance is plagiarism. Consequently, this can beget the loss of gray matter. Furthermore, critical data can result in controversy. The revelation of confidential information or contentious research results can bemuse citizens, as well as causing conflicts among them. A prime example of this is the Milgram experiment, which disclosed people's willingness to obey authority figures even when causing harm to others. This research then came in for a lot of criticism and was labeled as one of the most contentious experiments.
In conclusion, whilst sharing academic information without charge can benefit individuals and society in terms of study, work and societal issues, it can give rise to copyright infringement and controversy. Therefore, I am resolute that more data should be made available for everyone except for those of momentous significance.
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and methods of preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagree w 60
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- More people are stressed today than ever before What are the causes of this stress What can be done to address this problem 73
- In some countries teenagers have part time jobs while they are still at school Do you think this is a good idea 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the contemporary era, the development...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h viewpoints and state my perspective. On one hand, the merits of exchanging in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... thereby having better job prospects. On the other hand, data of paramount imp...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the most contentious experiments. In conclusion, whilst sharing academic i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, as regards, except for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50964187328 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02181882675 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592286501377 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8844357539 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2380952381 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265624854846 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707748185728 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10415791591 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187361865725 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14681236968 0.056905535591 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.