People are consuming more and more sugar-based drinks. Why? What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption?
Without a shadow of a doubt, with the afoot augmentation and progression in societies, human beings are facing miscellaneous problems. One of the stunning them is nothing but the high consumption of sugar used in potable liquids. It might influence the zenith and nadir of the health of a person. There are some reasons why its usage has waned. And some ways have been put forward to tackle this upheaval-causing matter. Both facets will be discussed succinctly.
The inclination of people towards using sugar-based drinks has enhanced, unfortunately. Furthermore, some people who are the opponent of the immoderate usage of sugar maintain that the industrial establishments along with the government are manipulating the taste of people. In this way, they exercise more and more sugar not merely in food but also in their beverage and non-beverage. For instance, Dr. Allon, who is the trailblazer in this area and holds a program to obviate this tribulation, avers that his research suggests some American incumbents having a factory for producing such materials along with some bribed and suborned doctors distorted data about the detrimental effects of undue drinking of such materials. To this end, both the tendency of people and the cupidity of factories will lead to the considerable drinking the sugary material.
There exis some way to cut down the usage of these materials, i.e., sugary drink materials. The responsibility of the first and foremost way is on the shoulder of NGOs who can freely and exhaustively aware people about the long-term inimical and deleterious efficacious of sugar. They can tell people what maladies will they inflict should they profusely exercise such materials. Moreover, some factories can employ other sweet materials such as saccharine in their products to shunt the taste of people.
To briefly recapitulate, we can boil this essay down to two items: (1) thanks to the deliberate manipulation of taste people by some opportunist incumbent and factories, the usage of these materials have escalated, (2) the NGOs can warn people about the irrefutable upshots and irreparable damages of the immoderate drinking as well as in lieu of sugar, some other materials can be substituted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | huy12345 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | trần thị như minh | 84 | view |
- The charts show Chart a the average speed of urban zone traffic in kilometers per hour or kph in a number of countries over a fifty year period including a future estimate and also Chart b the total number of urban zones per country in thousands 100
- Some people say there is no need for print newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not e ective Education and job training should be used instead Do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below gives information about the growth of the urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future 73
- Some say that people working in different job roles should get different amounts of holiday time. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, furthermore, moreover, so, well, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26404494382 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00281818563 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553370786517 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.1236038005 49.4020404114 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267699931595 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816466931016 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637171427536 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151715911994 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474569795933 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.