Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers
of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing
and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the
recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples
shape your position.
A nation’s primary objective must be the welfare of its citizens. Hence, while preparing the budget for the country, a major chunk of it must be dedicated to those issues which directly affect the general public. These issues include food security and employment availability, which can be heavily influenced by government funding. Funding for arts can sometimes be necessary to ensure the preservation of cultural heritage of the country by encouraging various local art forms. But, when the well being of the citizens is at stake, the government should reduce the funding for these other tasks, and focus on the hunger and unemployment issue more seriously.
When the economic growth of a nation is sluggish, the citizens need to face the aforementioned problems of hunger and unemployment. Hence, more emphasis must be given on proper inflation measures and developing an infrastructure that is more bussiness-friendly. Also, there must be an increased emphasis on education, so that the quality of labour in the country improves, and eventually the country becomes an attractive market for skilled workforce. These measures ensure that the citizens become self-reliant economically, and take care of their basic needs like hunger . As the economic condition of the nation gets better, the quality of life of its citizens also improves, and the fundamental problem of hunger and unemployment becomes insignificant.
This can be very well studied by looking at the Indian national budget during the post-independence era. The government supported the development of elite educational institutes across the nation (e.g. IITs) in order to foster the development of skilled professionals. Import and export of food items was balanced is such a way that the nation would have sufficient amount of food for its citizens, including a sufficient amount of surplus, in case a disaster strikes the nation. All these reforms helped deal with the hunger and unemployment issues and the results were quite commendable.
But it is not always necessary to cut down specifically on the budget portion allocated for encouraging arts. There might be other unnecessary spendings scheduled in the budget (like buying excess weapons in times of peace, or preparing for an invasion) which can be compromised in order to ensure well being of the commoners. Also, the funding dedicated to art is primarily to encourage different kinds of native forms of art, which otherwise might become extinct. These art forms, if preserved, could also provide employment opportunities for the practitioners of these art forms, consequently making sure that they do not remain hungry.
Hence, a nation must prioritize funding those aspects which could boost the economy in times where hunger and unemployment prevail. This could mean reducing funding from projects that encourage local art. But, funding for art provides a way for the local practitioners to be employed and afford food, which does partially accomplish the purpose. Hence, if some other component of the budget is futile, given the circumstances, then it must be compromised upon, instead of slashing art funding.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-05 | jenas | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-27 | mei_unavailable | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | mako_mew@hotmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | bhavna288 | 50 | view |
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 75
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 83
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 66
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 66
- The general welfare of a nation s people is a better indication of that nation s greatness than are the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In deve 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... those issues which directly affect the general public. These issues include food security and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ke care of their basic needs like hunger . As the economic condition of the nation...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, e.g., hence, if, look, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2659.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37171717172 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03056787894 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49898989899 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 836.1 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0864881357 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.863636364 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13636363636 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195210484942 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637157580029 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398776634792 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119281595683 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374439155038 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... those issues which directly affect the general public. These issues include food security and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ke care of their basic needs like hunger . As the economic condition of the nation...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, e.g., hence, if, look, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2659.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37171717172 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03056787894 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49898989899 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 836.1 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0864881357 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.863636364 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13636363636 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195210484942 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637157580029 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398776634792 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119281595683 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374439155038 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.