Task 2: In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development?
Some people think the Internet have gradually replaced the face-to-face conversation by working, shopping or chatting with friends from home without meeting in the real life. In my opinion, it is posive in some aspects and this trend also brings the negative development. I will discussed specifically in this essay below.
It is immutably true that the internet improves the life quality and makes the daily life of people become more convenient. One obvious example is overseas students who are difficult to enjoy the family meals due to the geographical distance. However, they can make the video calls on some social networks such as Facebook, Zalo to have the online meeting with their parents. In addition, the internet also has beneficial effects on environment. The reason is that, people would rather shop on electric commerce exchange rather than go to the shopping centre. Thefore, there is the decrease not only in the frequency of personal vehicle decreases but also in emmisions.
On the other hand, the direct communication sometimes is more effective. It is undeniable that the critical decisions should be discussed by face-to-face negotiation. For instance, the contracts require the actual signatures from parties involved and online meeting can not replace negotiating directly. Furthermore, overusing Internet can negatively impact on metal health of people. More specifically, children in the modern life tend to surf the internet for hours without socializing, therefore; they have problems regarding depression, anxiety disorder or communication impairment.
To sum up, internet is the useful tool used widely in the modern life. However, I personally believe it still has some negative influence on people’s heath
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | minhphambinh1234 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | cinderel | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-12 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- Task 2 In many countries today people buy a range of household goods TV microwave oven and rice cookers Is it a positive or negative development 67
- TASK 2 The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think that its advantages would outweigh its disadvantages 56
- Competition for university study is becoming increasingly strong Why are universities becoming more competent Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is sometimes
... Furthermore, the direct communication sometimes is more effective. It is true that the cri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5444015444 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87093613051 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6138996139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5129778762 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.461538462 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272606995041 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867929290801 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795258048197 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171760239822 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755406863621 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.