Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Misinformation is a way of manipulating citizen's of country, follower's and close relative in order to achieve the personal achievement's by any demagogue person or politician's. If there is any misinformation that leads to any biased judgements, eventually it is going to hamper the credibility, trustworthiness and candidness of the source or government or any official person. We need to take each and every information in to consideration and then need to verify its worthiness in order to be a base mark for any upcoming judgements or other things. Not every information should speculative as the important decisions taken by the governments are normally confidential but once the reports from verified source are out then we can mark our judgements on it.
First example is of origins of Covid-19, some reports state that the origin of bacteria which caused pandemic throughout the world is China. Other countries, formed their opinion based on origin of first case reported that China was the epicentre of pandemic but when the United Nation's Health Committee verified the security of the harmful bacteria of research institute, the method of treatment of utilizing, and many other aspects. After, doing so they formed a report that the source for pandemic is not China. Then, the other countries diverted from false origin of pandemic.
Second example is of treatments of Uighyers Muslims, who are an ethic people of China which were enforced to change their religion and other things in order to live a peaceful life in China. Mostly, peoples from other countries formed their opinions on this partial behaviour of Government of China. But, as far today not a single authorized committee or any trusted sources have verified the changes to report that the problem truly exist in China.
Thirdly is the example of Israel, who is considered as Nuclear Nation with at least 10 warheads capable of creating a nuclear annihilation across the globe. Even after the reports from varified sources are out about nuclear arsenal, Government of Israel never acceded the fact that they are a nuclear nation. In this case it's ambiguous to form an opinion as the subject is of important concern.
Not every piece of information that is fact is false, it might be true or false it totally depends on the matter, topic of information and source of information. One cannot form an opinion just on the basis of no source. I don't accept the claim as well as the reason is true in case of misinformation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-12 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Kamnele | 33 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | IshaanN | 50 | view |
- Teacher s salaries should be based on their student s academic performance 50
- Educational institutions should encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers 58
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species 83
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 50
- In any fields business politics education government those in power should be required to step down after five years 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...inion just on the basis of no source. I dont accept the claim as well as the reason ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, third, thirdly, well, at least, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99759615385 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84824730539 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516826923077 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6329603944 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.294117647 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4705882353 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133990298211 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045267282891 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622247124071 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825097632918 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823198706915 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.