Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from
pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed
In today’s world the students have a plethora of options in terms of study choices. Some of these fields are saturated in terms of research or future scope while the other options are upcoming and have a wide scope in future. Taking this into account it is imperative that the students make the right choice that is they choose the field in they are truly interested in albeit the one in which they are likely to succeed. Educational Institutions have a huge role to play in this regard and I am in agreement with the statement which says that educational institutions should have a responsibility to dissuade students from the taking up the fields of Study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Students today are exposed to the world of social media from a very young age and when it comes to making a choice in taking up their field of study it is likely that they might be having some pre conceived notions about a particular field from social media which might be totally untrue. Here the job of educational institutions comes into play. They can guide the students by explaining to them about different fields of study and then help them in identifying their areas of interest and analyze their strength and therefore in a way silently dissuading them from taking up the field in which they are unlikely to succeed.
However over here the institute must not play a proactive role but should rather act in a passive manner. With the help of their vast library of resources at their disposal they should help the students by giving them ideas about various study field, their curriculum their pre requisites, their future career path if they take up this field then the requirements to excel int the particular field thereby giving the students a clear idea of the field and also helping him correlate it with their own interests and strength. In this way the institution can dissuade the students from taking up the fields in which they are likely to them without being overbearing but rather by acting as a silent guiding light. However, if the students are still adamant about taking the same study field, then the institute must back down, however not before giving a clear warning to them regarding the choices they are going to make and their further implications.
Here it is very important that the institute dissuades and not debars the students from taking the field of their choice as despite all there might be students who will be having the fire in their belly to excel in a field in which people think he might not be able to succeed so in such cases it is advisable that the institutes back down but not before dissuading them from doing so.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 33
- to understand major characteristics if a society one must study its major cities 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
- Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument The following appeared in a memorandum from the new president of the Patriot car manufactu 66
- The following is a memo given to the residents of a housing complex Studies show that in 70 percent of traffic accidents at least one driver involved is less than 10 miles from home when the accident occurs This statistic indicates that drivers have a ten 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ions are upcoming and have a wide scope in future. Taking this into account it is imperat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutions'' or 'institution's'?
Suggestion: institutions'; institution's
...lly untrue. Here the job of educational institutions comes into play. They can guide the stu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a passive manner" with adverb for "passive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... a proactive role but should rather act in a passive manner. With the help of their vast library of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6829787234 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4505992837 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.410638297872 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 688.5 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 23.0359550562 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.439829993 60.3974514979 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.416666667 118.986275619 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.1666666667 23.4991977007 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482327913223 0.243740707755 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211201834433 0.0831039109588 254% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144504078569 0.0758088955206 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.354673516571 0.150359130593 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119059489853 0.0667264976115 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.1392134831 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 11.2143820225 157% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.