Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, an increasing number of people pay attention to the problem about knowledge sharing. However, whether we should pay for the information has recently caused a heated debate. In my view, it is partly inappropriate to collect fee in information especially in important fields.
It is clear that sharing as much information as possible in difference fields can promote different domains development. This is because the more information for free the more people can learn, which means that they can base on the previous research to create or find something wrong or new that some fields will develop more quickly.
In addition, sharing information freely can benefit the world prosperity. For example, some development countries can not apply or afford huge budget in research or some technical development which will lead them out of date. If some important knowledge free for them which means that they have opportunities to use these technology or information to advanced the development.
That is not to say that charging in information not reasonable or error. In some fields, such as medication research need to use too many materials and time to create the effective drug to overcome the intractable disease like cancer. Collecting fee in this important knowledge can inspire the researcher and make up for a loss after this process. However, if too high the price need to pay, too many technology will monopoly in some countries or companies, because some poor countries can not afford the exorbitant price.
In conclusion, there are many advantages in sharing information freely, such as advancing different fields development and promote the world prosperous. Meanwhile, we should not ignore the hard work of researchers and time investment.
- The chart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- In many countries more and more people buy a wide range of household goods like televisions microwave ovens and rice cooker Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor To what extent do you agree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowldege or experience 89
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'domains'' or 'domain's'?
Suggestion: domains'; domain's
...difference fields can promote different domains development. This is because the more i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'these technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; these technologies
...ans that they have opportunities to use these technology or information to advanced the developm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32142857143 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9413571073 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5218162475 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278624183977 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981381143636 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502669674071 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150988612839 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399071633258 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.